IS PAK LAH CONDONING, DEFENDING AND PROTECTING SEDITIOUS REMARKS MADE BY UMNO MPs??
UMNO Bukit Bendera Division Chief, Datuk Ahmad Ismail has once again demonstrated the party’s true colours and they obviously will never learn or change their bigoted ways.
This time round, even their badly discredited political partners, MCA and Gerakan came out strongly to denounce his statements made during the recent Permatang Pauh elections that the Malaysian Chinese were “penumpang” (squatters) and cannot be trusted to whip up racial support for UMNO. And he did it in front of Deputy Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak, without any reprimand from the latter.
Will it however be a complete show, signature campaigns and all, and Datuk Ahmad Ismail gets away scot free? Well, it certainly looks like it.
There is no other term to describe the Prime Minister and UMNO president, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s response to the controversy except to call him totally spineless. His only comment to the press to date:
“I will tell him not to do it again. You know in a campaign all sorts of things can come up. I don’t think he meant it. I’ll make sure to tell him not to use it again.”
The response is almost laughable. I believe it isn’t necessary for DAP to do much to ensure the continued political demise of MCA, MIC and Gerakan. UMNO, including the Prime Minister himself, will do it for us. All these controversies are happening as Malaysia celebrate its 51st Merdeka anniversary, packed with the rhetoric of national unity and harmony.
DAP has filed police reports throughout the country in every state today to symbolically voice our utmost disgust and disappointment with Datuk Ahmad Ismail for his racist remarks. It is our solemn protest to ask UMNO to uphold the spirit of Merdeka.
Many have pointed out the fact that Datuk Ahmad Ismail’s remarks have created feelings of discontent and hurt among the various races in the country, which is deemed illegal under the Sedition Act Clause 3(1)(e) which states that it is seditious:
to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of population of Malaysia
While, the criticism of Sedition Act is its lack of clarity and subjectivity of what is deemed to promote “feelings of ill-will”, Datuk Ahmad Ismail has clearly and conclusively breached another clause under Sedition Act, 3(1)(f) which deems seditious any act:
to question any matter, right, status, position, privilege, sovereignty or prerogative established or protect by the provisions of Part III of the Federal Constitution…
Now, Part III of the Federal Constitution is on Citizenship where it guarantees citizenship under Article 14
- Subject to the provisions of this Part, the following persons are citizens by operation of law, that is to say:
(a) every person born before Malaysia Day who is a citizen of the Federation by virtue of the provisions contained in Part 1 of the Second Schedule; and
Hence, under Malaysian laws, one cannot question the citizenship of Malaysians regardless of race or religion.
I’ve read the relevant clauses a few times, and I can see it no other way than to say that Datuk Ahmad Ismail is in breach of Malaysia’s laws and the Attorney-General must initiate actions against him. The offence is punishable by being sentenced to 3 years jail or RM5,000 fine or both.
Will Pak Lah act to uphold Malaysian constitution and laws? Or will he finally pick up political courage to do the necessary? Will MCA and Gerakan accept no punitive or concrete actions against Datuk Ahmad Ismail? Or will UMNO and Barisan Nasional component parties continue with its rhetoric of national unity, which can no longer mask its “cakap tak serupa bikin” culture.
Fong: It’s seditious!
By SIM LEOI LEOI and ANN TAN
He said this was because Ahmad had touched on the issue of citizenship involving non-Malays in the country.
“The matter of citizenship for non-Malays should not be questioned, just as some religious issues should not be called into dispute.
“An apology from Ahmad is not enough. A sedition charge should be considered against him,” he said here on Monday.
Dr Fong said this was the sentiment of most the MCA grassroots as many felt that such remarks from Umno leaders and members were “occurring too often.”
“They are very offended,” he said, on reports that Ahmad had allegedly called the Chinese pendatang (immigrants) at a ceramah (political address) during the Permatang Pauh by-election campaign recently.
The remarks came to light after they were widely reported in Chinese newspapers.
On Saturday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had said he would tell Ahmad not to repeat such remarks and that he (Abdullah) did not think Ahmad meant what he said.
However, other Barisan leaders had called for stricter action to be taken against Ahmad.
Dr Fong said it was not enough for Abdullah to merely tell Ahmad not to repeat such statements because “the latter obviously meant what he said”.
“He uttered these remarks during a ceramah in front of the Deputy Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak). I will bring this matter up at the next MCA central committee meeting,” he said.
In GEORGE TOWN, Bukit Gelugor MCA division youth chairman Koh Wan Leong said the state government should strip Ahmad of his Datukship.
Koh called on the Yang diPertua Negri Tun Abdul Rahman Abbas to do so as a lesson and reminder to others not to make remarks on sensitive issues that could provoke racial sentiment.
“The state government, as a responsible new government, should take action against him because he doesn’t deserve the Datukship.
“Ahmad should also apologise openly to all the Chinese in Malaysia,” Koh said at a press conference on Monday.
He also urged the Prime Minister, as the country’s leader and Umno president, to take disciplinary action against Ahmad, reminding Abdullah of his National Day message that Malaysia can again overcome any test it is currently facing if “we stand together and work hand in hand.”