M’sia in the red as 2009 FDI plunged by 81%

Aidila Razak
Jul 23, 10

A nosedive in foreign direct investments in Malaysia in 2009 follows a continued downward trend in FDI, increasingly overshadowed by regional players, noted a United Nations report.

NONEAccording to the World Investment Report 2010 unveiled today, FDI plunged 81 percent from US$7.32 billion (RM23.47 billion*) in 2008 to just US$1.38 billion (RM4.43 billion) last year.

(*Calculated based on exchange rate of US$1 = RM3.20650)

The 2009 FDI is less than half of the annual average FDI inflow between 1995 to 2005, which encompasses the long recovery period following the 1997 economic crisis.

Malaysia’s performance also pales in comparison with neighbouring economies like Thailand and Indonesia whose FDI figures did not contract as severely, despite the global financial crisis.

Thailand suffered a decline of US$4.44 billion (RM14.24 billion) while Indonesia saw a more modest drop of US$2.60 billion (RM8.32 billion) in foreign investments in 2009.

The severe dip also places Malaysia in the red for the first time in the last 15 years, with figures for cumulative FDI surpassing incoming investments by about US$1 billion (RM3.21 billion).

Doubts over high income target

Speaking at the UN Headquarters in Kuala Lumpur today, Universiti Malaya economist Rajah Rasiah (at podium in photo) said that Malaysia’s poor performance casts doubts over whether it can achieve the targets set to achieve high income status.

NONE“Malaysia is fortunate to be in a good neighbourhood, located among growing countries. The three largest recipients of FDI are located in Asia (but) Malaysia does not even make the top 10 list of recipients,” he said.

He added that this is remarkable for a country with a specific FDI policy, unlike Taiwan which is placed 10th in the list.

Conversely, Malaysia is “doing well in FDI outflows”, ranking fifth in the list of South, East and Southeast Asian countries investing abroad.

“Speaking to fund managers, I get the impression that we have the resources to invest locally but not many viable options to do so. Even local investors find us less attractive,” he said.

Human capital a barrier

The main stumbling block, he said, remains our narrow human capital pool which leaves industries stagnating in low-end production.

azlanHe added that while foreign investor laud the ease of doing business in Malaysia, a lack of skilled labour, research and development and technological capabilities is placing the country on the losing end of the increasingly competitive FDI battle.

Malaysia has 300 to 400 science and technology workers for every 100,000 persons, as opposed to 3,000 in countries which made the transition from middle to high income status, he said.

Similarly, the country is under-investing in research and development at only 0.64 percent of GDP, while others like Taiwan and South Korea are investing about 3 percent of theirs.

It should also look at mirroring such nations in developing a “vetting mechanism” for FDI to ensure that the investments can be a catalyst for human capital and technology development.

This will include screening FDI by choosing those with technologies that could be upgraded along the value chain and monitoring to ensure a transfer of expertise takes place.

azlan“We allow foreign firms in by giving grants and tax incentives, so we must ensure that spillovers (in terms of technology transfers) occur,” he said.

The bottom 40 percent of the population should also be assisted insofar as developing their skills to meet the shortage in industry.

“In assisting the lower income population, we should look at developing skills like precision engineering and die casting, which are sought after by foreign investors,” he said.


2 Responses to M’sia in the red as 2009 FDI plunged by 81%

  1. Rainbow Warrior says:

    Hmm … does foreign investment have to be DIRECT? Salaam (peace)

  2. Rainbow Warrior says:

    Maybe I’ll do a Soros and retract. Back in 1998 in his book Open Society – The Crisis of Global Capitalism he wrote Malaysia had embarked on a “beggar thy neighbour” policy. Then in 2000 edition he revised his opinion cos Malaysia was doing well compared to IMF policies. Besides, USA embarked on capital controls in 1965.

    But then again, perhaps I need to clarify. Actually, I meant JVs (that’s NOT direct, is it?) with technology experts, value add in Malaysia, re-export … Look at the trade flows of Japan, Germany, Netherlands and France … Why reinvent the wheel? Just learn from the best (including other countries not mentioned, of course …) – adapt and improve! The other meaning of INDIRECT is a funding structure that we keep close to our heart!

    GNI = GDP + Foreign-sourced income. We don’t really have that much population to feed compared to neighbours and FDI competitors. Makes more sense to go for foreign-sourced income, doing what we do best. Besides, does science and technology really create lots of jobs? Think robotics and plant control systems. The good thing about Malaysians is that we are creative and skilled (people invest in our knowledge workers). And mostly good in the services industry. And as the trading entrepot the melting pot of culture since time immemorial, we have our heritage worth seeing. The birthplace of South East Asia, the Malaiyur remnants of the Great Flood, a cornerstone of Sundaland, Alangkahsuka Srivijaya …

    PM’s on the right track with Green. Plenty to do in that! Obviously, have passed up to Ayahanda Tun, PM et al on Che Det’s blog the MINDA intranet … RAHSIA only get published when KRIS RIMAU are ready!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: